Kopia vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 35,412
First released20192015
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Kopia is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kopia and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Restic with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons