SHSelfHostIndex

Kopia vs Restic Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KO Kopia Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface VS RE Restic Browser Desktop app to browse and restore Restic snapshots
FeatureKopiaRestic Browser
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 1,275
First released20192022
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Restic Browser if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Restic Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Restic Browser better?

Neither is universally better. Kopia has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kopia and Restic Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Restic Browser under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Restic Browser with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Restic Browser: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons