Kopia vs Bupstash

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaBupstash
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 924
First released20192020
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Bupstash if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Bupstash details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Bupstash better?

Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Bupstash if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kopia and Bupstash free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Bupstash under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Bupstash with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Bupstash: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons