Bupstash vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBupstashRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 924★ 35,412
First released20202015
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Bupstash if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Bupstash details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bupstash or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Bupstash and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Bupstash is licensed under MIT and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bupstash and Restic with Docker?

Bupstash: check the project docs for container support. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons