Kong Gateway vs Tyk

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKong GatewayTyk
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageLuaGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 43,947★ 10,788
First released20152014
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, ApigeeApigee, AWS API Gateway

Why pick each one

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Choose Tyk if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
Tyk details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway or Tyk better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kong Gateway and Tyk free and open-source?

Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tyk under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kong Gateway and Tyk with Docker?

Kong Gateway: yes. Tyk: yes.

Related comparisons