Emissary-ingress vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEmissary-ingressKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentkubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 4,518★ 43,947
First released20172015
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, KongAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose Emissary-ingress if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Emissary-ingress details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is Emissary-ingress or Kong Gateway better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Emissary-ingress and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. Emissary-ingress is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Emissary-ingress and Kong Gateway with Docker?

Emissary-ingress: check the project docs for container support. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons