Kong Gateway vs Pi-hole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKong GatewayPi-hole
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0EUPL-1.2
LanguageLuaShell
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker
GitHub stars★ 43,947★ 60,247
First released20152026
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
Pi-hole details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway or Pi-hole better?

Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kong Gateway and Pi-hole free and open-source?

Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kong Gateway and Pi-hole with Docker?

Kong Gateway: yes. Pi-hole: yes.

Related comparisons