Kleeja vs Send
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Kleeja | Send |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 193 | ★ 5,847 |
| First released | 2006 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Kleeja if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Send if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kleeja or Send better?
Neither is universally better. Send has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kleeja and Send free and open-source?
Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Send under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kleeja and Send with Docker?
Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. Send: yes.