Kimai vs timetrace

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKimaitimetrace
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 4,871★ 794
First released20062021
ReplacesToggl, Harvest, ClockifyClockify, Toggl

Why pick each one

Choose Kimai if…

  • Mature and actively maintained
  • Strong invoicing features
Kimai details

Choose timetrace if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
timetrace details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimai or timetrace better?

Neither is universally better. Kimai has the larger community, while timetrace is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kimai and timetrace free and open-source?

Yes. Kimai is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and timetrace under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kimai and timetrace with Docker?

Kimai: yes. timetrace: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons