Keystone vs Datenstrom Yellow
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
VS
Datenstrom Yellow
Flat-file CMS for small websites that you control
| Feature | Keystone | Datenstrom Yellow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,938 | ★ 484 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Strapi | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Keystone or Datenstrom Yellow better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while Datenstrom Yellow is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Keystone and Datenstrom Yellow free and open-source?
Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and Datenstrom Yellow under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keystone and Datenstrom Yellow with Docker?
Keystone: yes. Datenstrom Yellow: yes.