SHSelfHostIndex

Keystone vs WonderCMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE Keystone Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API VS WO WonderCMS Tiny flat-file CMS that is one of the smallest available
FeatureKeystoneWonderCMS
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 736
First released20132008
ReplacesContentful, StrapiWordPress

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose WonderCMS if…

  • Incredibly easy to deploy
  • Almost no maintenance
WonderCMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or WonderCMS better?

Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while WonderCMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Keystone and WonderCMS free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and WonderCMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and WonderCMS with Docker?

Keystone: yes. WonderCMS: yes.

Related comparisons