SHSelfHostIndex

Keystone vs Wiki-Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE Keystone Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API VS WI Wiki-Go Databaseless flat-file wiki platform
FeatureKeystoneWiki-Go
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 608
First released20132025
ReplacesContentful, StrapiGitBook, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose Wiki-Go if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Wiki-Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or Wiki-Go better?

Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Keystone and Wiki-Go free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and Wiki-Go under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and Wiki-Go with Docker?

Keystone: yes. Wiki-Go: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons