SHSelfHostIndex

Keystone vs TYPO3

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE Keystone Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API VS TY TYPO3 Enterprise CMS popular for large corporate websites
FeatureKeystoneTYPO3
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 1,200
First released20131998
ReplacesContentful, StrapiAdobe Experience Manager, Sitecore

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose TYPO3 if…

  • Built for large enterprise deployments
  • Reliable LTS release cycle
TYPO3 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or TYPO3 better?

Keystone is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider TYPO3 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Keystone and TYPO3 free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and TYPO3 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and TYPO3 with Docker?

Keystone: yes. TYPO3: yes.

Related comparisons