Keystone vs REDAXO
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
VS
REDAXO
Simple, flexible and useful content management system (documentation
| Feature | Keystone | REDAXO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,938 | ★ 353 |
| First released | 2013 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Strapi | — |
Why pick each one
Choose REDAXO if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Keystone or REDAXO better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Keystone and REDAXO free and open-source?
Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and REDAXO under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keystone and REDAXO with Docker?
Keystone: yes. REDAXO: yes.