Keystone vs MODX Revolution
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
VS
MODX Revolution
CMS and application framework with creative freedom
| Feature | Keystone | MODX Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,938 | ★ 1,403 |
| First released | 2013 | 2005 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Strapi | WordPress, Drupal |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Keystone or MODX Revolution better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Keystone and MODX Revolution free and open-source?
Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and MODX Revolution under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keystone and MODX Revolution with Docker?
Keystone: yes. MODX Revolution: yes.