Kerberos Agent vs CameraView
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Agent
Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
VS
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
| Feature | Kerberos Agent | CameraView |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,088 | ★ 5,128 |
| First released | 2014 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Proprietary camera SDKs |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Agent or CameraView better?
Neither is universally better. CameraView has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kerberos Agent and CameraView free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and CameraView under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Agent and CameraView with Docker?
Kerberos Agent: yes. CameraView: check the project docs for container support.