Conduit File Sync vs MinIO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConduit File SyncMinIO
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,221★ 61,387
First released20132015
ReplacesDropboxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Conduit File Sync if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.2k GitHub stars
Conduit File Sync details

Choose MinIO if…

  • Excellent performance
  • Drop-in S3 replacement
  • Scales horizontally
MinIO details

Frequently asked questions

Is Conduit File Sync or MinIO better?

Neither is universally better. MinIO has the larger community, while Conduit File Sync is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Conduit File Sync and MinIO free and open-source?

Yes. Conduit File Sync is licensed under MIT and MinIO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Conduit File Sync and MinIO with Docker?

Conduit File Sync: yes. MinIO: yes.

Related comparisons