OpenCloud vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | OpenCloud | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 90 · Excellent | 90 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,056 | ★ 5,877 |
| First released | 2025 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Dropbox |
What are OpenCloud and WebDAV Server Go?
OpenCloud
OpenCloud is a modern open-source file sync, share, and collaboration platform built on a microservice architecture. It targets organizations wanting a current, lightweight content collaboration server. It is deployed via Docker Compose.
- Microservice-based architecture
- Web-based collaboration
- Lightweight Go backend
- Compatible desktop clients
WebDAV Server Go
A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.
- Standalone WebDAV
- Per-user permissions
- Minimal backend
- Cross-platform clients
OpenCloud vs WebDAV Server Go: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for OpenCloud versus MIT for WebDAV Server Go. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for OpenCloud. WebDAV Server Go is the more established project (first released 2017), while OpenCloud arrived in 2025.
Why pick each one
Choose OpenCloud if…
- Modern, fast codebase
- Lightweight footprint
- Permissively licensed
Watch out for
- Very new project
- Smaller ecosystem so far
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCloud or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. OpenCloud has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OpenCloud and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCloud and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
OpenCloud: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, OpenCloud or WebDAV Server Go?
WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for OpenCloud. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- OpenCloud vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- WebDAV Server Go vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- OpenCloud vs Ceph
- OpenCloud vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- WebDAV Server Go vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- OpenCloud vs Cloudreve
- OpenCloud vs copyparty
- WebDAV Server Go vs copyparty
- OpenCloud vs CryptPad
- OpenCloud vs Dufs
- WebDAV Server Go vs Dufs