Karma vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKarmaApache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 2,674★ 24,915
First released20172015
ReplacesPagerDutyNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Karma if…

  • Clear at-a-glance overview
  • Lightweight
Karma details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Karma or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Karma is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Karma and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. Karma is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Karma and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

Karma: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons