Grafana vs Karma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanaKarma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 2,674
First released20142017
ReplacesDatadogPagerDuty

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose Karma if…

  • Clear at-a-glance overview
  • Lightweight
Karma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Karma better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community, while Karma is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana and Karma free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Karma under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and Karma with Docker?

Grafana: yes. Karma: yes.

Related comparisons