Karakeep vs Shiori
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Karakeep
Self-hosted bookmark everything app with AI tagging
VS
Shiori
Simple bookmark manager built with Go
| Feature | Karakeep | Shiori |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,164 | ★ 11,574 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Shiori if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Karakeep or Shiori better?
Neither is universally better. Karakeep has the larger community, while Shiori is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Karakeep and Shiori free and open-source?
Yes. Karakeep is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shiori under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Karakeep and Shiori with Docker?
Karakeep: yes. Shiori: yes.