Karakeep vs omnom

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKarakeepomnom
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score98 · Excellent70 · Good
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,250★ 665
First released20242020
ReplacesPocket, Raindrop.ioPocket, Raindrop.io

What are Karakeep and omnom?

Karakeep

Karakeep, formerly Hoarder, is a self-hosted app for bookmarking links, notes, and images with AI-powered automatic tagging and full-text search. It targets users who want a smart digital scrapbook. It is deployed via Docker.

  • Bookmark links, notes and images
  • AI-based automatic tagging
  • Full-page archiving
  • Mobile apps and extensions

Read the full Karakeep guide →

omnom

omnom is a self-hosted bookmarking service that stores both the link and a full snapshot of the page at the time it was saved. This guarantees access to content even if the original page changes or disappears.

  • Full-page snapshots
  • Browser extension
  • Tagging and search
  • Multi-user support

Karakeep vs omnom: key differences

Karakeep is written in TypeScript, while omnom is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Karakeep versus MIT for omnom. Omnom is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Karakeep. Omnom is the more established project (first released 2020), while Karakeep arrived in 2024. Karakeep has the considerably larger community, at 29,250 GitHub stars versus 665.

Why pick each one

Choose Karakeep if…

  • Smart AI tagging
  • Archives full pages
  • Polished apps

Watch out for

  • Heavier than simple tools
  • AI features need an API key
Karakeep details

Choose omnom if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM

Watch out for

  • Snapshots use disk space
  • Smaller community
omnom details

Frequently asked questions

Is Karakeep or omnom better?

Neither is universally better. Karakeep has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Karakeep and omnom free and open-source?

Yes. Karakeep is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and omnom under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Karakeep and omnom with Docker?

Karakeep: yes. omnom: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Karakeep or omnom?

omnom has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Karakeep. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons