Kaneo vs OpenProject
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kaneo
Project management platform focused on simplicity and efficiency
VS
OpenProject
Open-source project management and collaboration
| Feature | Kaneo | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,637 | ★ 15,794 |
| First released | 2026 | 2012 |
| Replaces | — | Jira, Asana |
Why pick each one
Choose Kaneo if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
Choose OpenProject if…
- Very feature-complete
- Good for classic project management
- Strong permissions
Frequently asked questions
Is Kaneo or OpenProject better?
Neither is universally better. OpenProject has the larger community, while Kaneo is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kaneo and OpenProject free and open-source?
Yes. Kaneo is licensed under MIT and OpenProject under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kaneo and OpenProject with Docker?
Kaneo: yes. OpenProject: yes.