Kan vs Tasks.md

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKanTasks.md
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score88 · Excellent66 · Good
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 5,684★ 2,199
First released20242023
ReplacesTrelloTrello

What are Kan and Tasks.md?

Kan

Kan is an open-source, self-hosted kanban board application positioned as a Trello alternative. Built with TypeScript, it offers boards, lists, labels, member collaboration, and public board sharing in a modern web interface.

  • Trello-style kanban boards
  • Labels and members
  • Public board sharing
  • Modern responsive UI

Tasks.md

Tasks.md is a self-hosted, file-based task management tool where every card is a Markdown file. It provides a kanban interface backed entirely by plain text files.

  • Cards stored as Markdown files
  • No database required
  • Drag-and-drop kanban board
  • Easy to back up with git

Kan vs Tasks.md: key differences

Kan is written in TypeScript, while Tasks.md is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Kan versus MIT for Tasks.md. Tasks.md is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Kan. Kan has the considerably larger community, at 5,684 GitHub stars versus 2,199.

Why pick each one

Choose Kan if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Kan details

Choose Tasks.md if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
Tasks.md details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kan or Tasks.md better?

Neither is universally better. Kan has the larger community, while Tasks.md is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kan and Tasks.md free and open-source?

Yes. Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tasks.md under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kan and Tasks.md with Docker?

Kan: yes. Tasks.md: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Kan or Tasks.md?

Tasks.md has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Kan. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons