Kafka Exporter vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKafka ExporterUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, kubernetesdocker
GitHub stars★ 2,537★ 89,960
First released20172021
ReplacesConfluent Control Center, Datadog KafkaPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Kafka Exporter if…

  • Simpler than JMX monitoring
  • Focused lag visibility
Kafka Exporter details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kafka Exporter or Uptime Kuma better?

Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kafka Exporter and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Kafka Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kafka Exporter and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Kafka Exporter: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons