JumpServer vs Wirehole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
Wirehole
WireGuard, Pi-hole, and Unbound in one compose stack
| Feature | JumpServer | Wirehole |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 4,967 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | NordVPN |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose Wirehole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or Wirehole better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while Wirehole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are JumpServer and Wirehole free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Wirehole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and Wirehole with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. Wirehole: yes.