JumpServer vs WireGuard Portal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
WireGuard Portal
Web-based configuration portal for WireGuard
| Feature | JumpServer | WireGuard Portal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 1,791 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose WireGuard Portal if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or WireGuard Portal better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are JumpServer and WireGuard Portal free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WireGuard Portal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and WireGuard Portal with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. WireGuard Portal: yes.