JumpServer vs Webtop
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
Webtop
Containerized full Linux desktop accessible from a browser
| Feature | JumpServer | Webtop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 4,319 |
| First released | 2014 | 2021 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | Kasm Workspaces |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose Webtop if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or Webtop better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while Webtop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are JumpServer and Webtop free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Webtop under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and Webtop with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. Webtop: yes.