JumpServer vs ttyd
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | JumpServer | ttyd |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 12,165 |
| First released | 2014 | 2016 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | PuTTY |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose ttyd if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or ttyd better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while ttyd is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are JumpServer and ttyd free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ttyd under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and ttyd with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. ttyd: yes.