JumpServer vs trzsz
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
trzsz
File transfer over SSH with progress and resume
| Feature | JumpServer | trzsz |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 1,439 |
| First released | 2014 | 2022 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | lrzsz, SCP |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose trzsz if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or trzsz better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while trzsz is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are JumpServer and trzsz free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and trzsz under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and trzsz with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. trzsz: check the project docs for container support.