JumpServer vs websockify
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
websockify
WebSocket-to-TCP bridge for browser remote access
| Feature | JumpServer | websockify |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 4,427 |
| First released | 2014 | 2010 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | proprietary remote gateways |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or websockify better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while websockify is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are JumpServer and websockify free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and websockify under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and websockify with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. websockify: check the project docs for container support.