JumpServer vs Netmaker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
VS
Netmaker
WireGuard-based virtual networks with a management server
| Feature | JumpServer | Netmaker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31,230 | ★ 11,740 |
| First released | 2014 | 2021 |
| Replaces | CyberArk, Teleport | Tailscale, ZeroTier |
Why pick each one
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Choose Netmaker if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or Netmaker better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are JumpServer and Netmaker free and open-source?
Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Netmaker under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JumpServer and Netmaker with Docker?
JumpServer: yes. Netmaker: yes.