JSXC vs Openfire
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
JSXC
JavaScript XMPP client for the browser
VS
Openfire
Real-time collaboration XMPP server written in Java
| Feature | JSXC | Openfire |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 732 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2013 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Slack | Slack, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Choose JSXC if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is JSXC or Openfire better?
Neither is universally better. Openfire has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are JSXC and Openfire free and open-source?
Yes. JSXC is licensed under MIT and Openfire under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run JSXC and Openfire with Docker?
JSXC: check the project docs for container support. Openfire: yes.