Joplin vs Wallabag

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJoplinWallabag
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,856★ 12,884
First released20172013
ReplacesEvernote, OneNotePocket, Instapaper

Why pick each one

Choose Joplin if…

  • Strong privacy with E2EE
  • Flexible sync options
  • Active development
Joplin details

Choose Wallabag if…

  • Great read-it-later experience
  • Own your reading list
  • Apps available
Wallabag details

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or Wallabag better?

Joplin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Wallabag if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Joplin and Wallabag free and open-source?

Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wallabag under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Joplin and Wallabag with Docker?

Joplin: yes. Wallabag: yes.

Related comparisons