Joplin vs Markor Sync
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Joplin
Open-source note-taking and to-do app with sync
VS
Markor Sync
Plain-text and Markdown notes editor for synced folders
| Feature | Joplin | Markor Sync |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 55,856 | ★ 5,953 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Evernote, OneNote | Google Keep, Evernote |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Joplin or Markor Sync better?
Neither is universally better. Joplin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Joplin and Markor Sync free and open-source?
Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Markor Sync under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Joplin and Markor Sync with Docker?
Joplin: yes. Markor Sync: check the project docs for container support.