Archivy vs Markor Sync
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Archivy
Self-hosted knowledge repository for bookmarks and notes
VS
Markor Sync
Plain-text and Markdown notes editor for synced folders
| Feature | Archivy | Markor Sync |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,268 | ★ 5,953 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Evernote | Google Keep, Evernote |
Why pick each one
Choose Archivy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Archivy or Markor Sync better?
Markor Sync is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Archivy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Archivy and Markor Sync free and open-source?
Yes. Archivy is licensed under MIT and Markor Sync under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Archivy and Markor Sync with Docker?
Archivy: yes. Markor Sync: check the project docs for container support.