SHSelfHostIndex

Joomla vs Payload CMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
JO Joomla Versatile CMS balancing power and ease of use VS PA Payload CMS TypeScript-native headless CMS and application framework
FeatureJoomlaPayload CMS
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 5,122★ 44,043
First released20052021
ReplacesWix, SquarespaceContentful, Sanity

Why pick each one

Choose Joomla if…

  • Good middle ground in flexibility
  • Multilingual without extra plugins
Joomla details

Choose Payload CMS if…

  • Excellent TypeScript developer experience
  • No vendor lock-in
Payload CMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Joomla or Payload CMS better?

Neither is universally better. Payload CMS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Joomla and Payload CMS free and open-source?

Yes. Joomla is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Payload CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Joomla and Payload CMS with Docker?

Joomla: yes. Payload CMS: yes.

Related comparisons