Anchor CMS vs Joomla
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Anchor CMS | Joomla |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,298 | ★ 5,122 |
| First released | 2012 | 2005 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Wix, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Anchor CMS or Joomla better?
Neither is universally better. Joomla has the larger community, while Anchor CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anchor CMS and Joomla free and open-source?
Yes. Anchor CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Joomla under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anchor CMS and Joomla with Docker?
Anchor CMS: yes. Joomla: yes.