Anchor CMS vs Drupal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anchor CMS
Lightweight blogging-focused CMS
VS
Drupal
Flexible enterprise CMS for complex content structures
| Feature | Anchor CMS | Drupal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,298 | ★ 4,280 |
| First released | 2012 | 2001 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Anchor CMS or Drupal better?
Neither is universally better. Drupal has the larger community, while Anchor CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anchor CMS and Drupal free and open-source?
Yes. Anchor CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Drupal under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anchor CMS and Drupal with Docker?
Anchor CMS: yes. Drupal: yes.