Jitsu vs Highlight.io
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsu
Open-source data ingestion and event collection engine
VS
Highlight.io
Open-source session replay and product monitoring
| Feature | Jitsu | Highlight.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,016 | ★ 9,357 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Segment | LogRocket, Sentry |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsu or Highlight.io better?
Neither is universally better. Highlight.io has the larger community, while Jitsu is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jitsu and Highlight.io free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsu is licensed under MIT and Highlight.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsu and Highlight.io with Docker?
Jitsu: yes. Highlight.io: yes.