Fathom Lite vs Jitsu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fathom Lite
Simple, open-source website analytics
VS
Jitsu
Open-source data ingestion and event collection engine
| Feature | Fathom Lite | Jitsu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,013 | ★ 5,016 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Segment |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Fathom Lite or Jitsu better?
Fathom Lite is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jitsu if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fathom Lite and Jitsu free and open-source?
Yes. Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT and Jitsu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fathom Lite and Jitsu with Docker?
Fathom Lite: yes. Jitsu: yes.