Ackee vs Jitsu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ackee
Self-hosted, privacy-focused analytics tool
VS
Jitsu
Open-source data ingestion and event collection engine
| Feature | Ackee | Jitsu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,689 | ★ 5,016 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Segment |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ackee or Jitsu better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsu has the larger community, while Ackee is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ackee and Jitsu free and open-source?
Yes. Ackee is licensed under MIT and Jitsu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ackee and Jitsu with Docker?
Ackee: yes. Jitsu: yes.