Jitsu vs Plausible
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsu
Open-source data ingestion and event collection engine
VS
Plausible
Lightweight, privacy-friendly website analytics
| Feature | Jitsu | Plausible |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Elixir |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,016 | ★ 28,416 |
| First released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Segment | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsu or Plausible better?
Neither is universally better. Plausible has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Jitsu and Plausible free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsu is licensed under MIT and Plausible under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsu and Plausible with Docker?
Jitsu: yes. Plausible: yes.