Jitsi Meet vs Openfire Pade Plugin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsi Meet
Secure, fully featured video conferencing
VS
Openfire Pade Plugin
Meetings and messaging plugin for Openfire
| Feature | Jitsi Meet | Openfire Pade Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 29,702 | ★ 60 |
| First released | 2013 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Google Meet | Zoom, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose Openfire Pade Plugin if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi Meet or Openfire Pade Plugin better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Meet has the larger community, while Openfire Pade Plugin is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jitsi Meet and Openfire Pade Plugin free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsi Meet is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Openfire Pade Plugin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsi Meet and Openfire Pade Plugin with Docker?
Jitsi Meet: yes. Openfire Pade Plugin: check the project docs for container support.