Element Call vs Openfire Pade Plugin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Element Call
Encrypted group video calls on Matrix
VS
Openfire Pade Plugin
Meetings and messaging plugin for Openfire
| Feature | Element Call | Openfire Pade Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 984 | ★ 60 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Google Meet | Zoom, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose Element Call if…
- Strong encryption
- Federated via Matrix
- No app install needed
Choose Openfire Pade Plugin if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Element Call or Openfire Pade Plugin better?
Neither is universally better. Element Call has the larger community, while Openfire Pade Plugin is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Element Call and Openfire Pade Plugin free and open-source?
Yes. Element Call is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Openfire Pade Plugin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Element Call and Openfire Pade Plugin with Docker?
Element Call: yes. Openfire Pade Plugin: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Element Call vs Greenlight
- Openfire Pade Plugin vs Greenlight
- Element Call vs BigBlueButton
- Openfire Pade Plugin vs BigBlueButton
- Element Call vs Cinny
- Openfire Pade Plugin vs Cinny
- Element Call vs Jitsi Videobridge
- Openfire Pade Plugin vs Jitsi Videobridge
- Element Call vs Conduit
- Element Call vs Converse.js
- Openfire Pade Plugin vs Converse.js