coturn vs Jitsi Meet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
coturn
Open-source TURN and STUN server for WebRTC
VS
Jitsi Meet
Secure, fully featured video conferencing
| Feature | coturn | Jitsi Meet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,274 | ★ 29,702 |
| First released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Replaces | — | Zoom, Google Meet |
Why pick each one
Choose coturn if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.3k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is coturn or Jitsi Meet better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Meet has the larger community, while coturn is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are coturn and Jitsi Meet free and open-source?
Yes. coturn is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Jitsi Meet under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run coturn and Jitsi Meet with Docker?
coturn: yes. Jitsi Meet: yes.