eturnal vs Jitsi Meet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
eturnal
STUN and TURN server for real-time applications
VS
Jitsi Meet
Secure, fully featured video conferencing
| Feature | eturnal | Jitsi Meet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Erlang | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 340 | ★ 29,702 |
| First released | 2020 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Twilio STUN/TURN | Zoom, Google Meet |
Why pick each one
Choose eturnal if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Erlang
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is eturnal or Jitsi Meet better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Meet has the larger community, while eturnal is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are eturnal and Jitsi Meet free and open-source?
Yes. eturnal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jitsi Meet under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run eturnal and Jitsi Meet with Docker?
eturnal: yes. Jitsi Meet: yes.