Jekyll vs Orchard Core
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jekyll
Simple, blog-aware static site generator
VS
Orchard Core
Modular, multi-tenant CMS built on ASP.NET Core
| Feature | Jekyll | Orchard Core |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Ruby | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 51,622 | ★ 8,148 |
| First released | 2008 | 2018 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | Sitecore, WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jekyll or Orchard Core better?
Jekyll is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Orchard Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jekyll and Orchard Core free and open-source?
Yes. Jekyll is licensed under MIT and Orchard Core under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jekyll and Orchard Core with Docker?
Jekyll: check the project docs for container support. Orchard Core: yes.