Astro vs Orchard Core
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Astro
Modern static site framework for content-driven sites
VS
Orchard Core
Modular, multi-tenant CMS built on ASP.NET Core
| Feature | Astro | Orchard Core |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 61,631 | ★ 8,148 |
| First released | 2021 | 2018 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Medium | Sitecore, WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Astro or Orchard Core better?
Astro is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Orchard Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Astro and Orchard Core free and open-source?
Yes. Astro is licensed under MIT and Orchard Core under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Astro and Orchard Core with Docker?
Astro: check the project docs for container support. Orchard Core: yes.