Blogofile vs Jekyll
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Blogofile
Static blog and website compiler in Python
VS
Jekyll
Simple, blog-aware static site generator
| Feature | Blogofile | Jekyll |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 347 | ★ 51,622 |
| First released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Blogofile if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Blogofile or Jekyll better?
Neither is universally better. Jekyll has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Blogofile and Jekyll free and open-source?
Yes. Blogofile is licensed under MIT and Jekyll under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Blogofile and Jekyll with Docker?
Blogofile: check the project docs for container support. Jekyll: check the project docs for container support.